Afterthoughts from the International Symposium on North Korean Human Rights
Other Organizations/In Korea 2007/11/20 17:08Afterthoughts from the International Symposium on North Korean Human Rights
Intern, RBA Research Team
Last year at school, I wrote a paper on “Why North Korean Defectors are Not Recognized as Refugees?” Through this assignment, I learned about international refugee law and current situations on North Korean defectors. So at this symposium, I expected to learn up-to-date theory and action within this field.
The symposium really did not come up with any tangible solutions, especially regarding UNHCR’s stance and
As for the Chinese standpoint, this event was said to be the first time any professors from
The Political External Section Chief of U.S. Embassy, Brian McFeeters, stated that nuclear issues takes precedence over humanitarian concerns. He emphasized that the North Korean defectors issue falls within the responsibility of Asian nations, rather than the U.S government, because the majority of defectors reside in Asian countries such as
Overall, the symposium was an opportunity for me to reaffirm the viewpoints of various parties concerned, although I would have liked to hear about opinions from Chinese government representatives. It seemed that a new consensus in favor of silent diplomacy is being built as an alternative to publicizing. Silent diplomacy may give involved countries more room for practical action; however, it risks leaving vulnerable people at the government’s disposal. This is why I can’t help but hope that silent diplomacy is not just another way of turning a blind eye to the asylum-seekers from
이올린에 북마크하기
